Cookies on this website

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you click 'Accept all cookies' we'll assume that you are happy to receive all cookies and you won't see this message again. If you click 'Reject all non-essential cookies' only necessary cookies providing core functionality such as security, network management, and accessibility will be enabled. Click 'Find out more' for information on how to change your cookie settings.

Cardiac arrhythmias pose a serious global health challenge. The commonest sustained arrhythmia atrial fibrillation (AF) affects 1–2% of the worldwide population. Antiarrhythmic drugs (AADs) remain central to their pharmacotherapeutic management. As a solution, Professors Ming Lei, Derek Terrar (both Pharmacology), Christopher Huang (University of Cambridge), and Lin Wu (Beijing University Hospital) developed and proposed the 2018 Oxford modernized antiarrhythmic drug (AAD) classification (Circulation, 2018;138:1879–1896).

This new classification, while encompassing, the historic, widely accepted, Vaughan Williams VW classification. Its extensive subsequent citations reflect its significant global impact on AAD understanding and clinical use. This prompted its recent further development into a practical, more clinically useful, framework in a newly published (2025) article in Heart Rhythm, the official journal of the Heart Rhythm Society (USA) (Heart Rhythm. 2025 Apr 3:S1547-5271).

Those major approaches advancing cardiac arrhythmia management have now been globally endorsed and recognized in international clinical guidelines for AAD management. This came in the latest Clinical Consensus Statement [Practical Compendium of Antiarrhythmic Drugs: Europace, 2025 Mar 30; euaf076] from the Task Force of the  European Heart Rhythm Association (EHRA) of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC). A panel of internationally recognized cardiology experts highlighted and adopted the modernized 2018 Oxford classification as an essential improvement over the classic VW system.

This noted that limitations in the clinical guidance of the original VW classification had prompt repeated modernization efforts. It then regarded the modernized Oxford AAD classification as the most comprehensive and clinically relevant revision to date. This updated scheme systematized a broad range of drug classes and subclasses. It placed these within two overarching categories: regulatory-approved, clinically used AADs (Classes 0, I–IV, and VII) and investigational new drugs under development (INDs; Classes V and VI). The former included existing off-label formulations (e.g ivabradine and ranolazine in Classes 0 and Id respectively). Figure 1 illustrates this stratification.

This evolution in AAD classification represents a major step advancing harmonization of therapeutic strategies and drug development across global healthcare systems. The Modernized Oxford AAD classification is here poised to become the standard reference in clinical cardiology for managing cardiac arrhythmias. 

References: 

Lei M, Wu L, Terrar DA, Huang CL. Modernized Classification of Cardiac Antiarrhythmic Drugs. Circulation. 2018 Oct 23;138(17):1879-1896. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.118.035455.

Lei M, Wu L, Terrar DA, Huang CL. The modernized classification of cardiac antiarrhythmic drugs: Its application to clinical practice. Heart Rhythm. 2025 Apr 3:S1547-5271(25)02300-8. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2025.03.1997.

Merino JL et al. Practical Compendium of Antiarrhythmic Drugs: A Clinical Consensus Statement of the European Heart Rhythm Association of the ESC . EP Europace, euaf076, https://doi.org/10.1093/europace/euaf076